Trystan's Costume Closet
  • About Me
  • Costumes
  • Articles
  • SCA

Why Metal Grommets Are the Visible Panty Lines of Historical Costuming

Posted on February 17, 2012 by Trystan

Metal grommet

Metal grommet

When you’re just starting out in this wonderful world of costuming, you tend to use what’s easy and fast. This is no crime, we’ve all done it, that’s to be expected. If you want to lace up a garment, you need to reinforce the lacing holes so they don’t wear out, and you find some handy little metal ring things at the fabric store, either small one-part, punch-in eyelets or the bigger two-part grommets. You insert them in the front of a renfaire bodice or the back of a Victorian ballgown or maybe the sides of a medieval fitted gown, lace it tight with ribbons, and you’re good to go.

Visible panty lines by Lord Copplepot, Wikimedia Commons

Visible panty lines by Lord Copplepot, Wikimedia Commons

Seems like the perfect solution, right? Well, sure, those metal eyelets and grommets work. But they were not used in outerwear in historical periods before the 20th century. Grommets were intended for underwear and shoes only.

Throughout most of history, laced garments had hand-worked eyelets. Small, simple holes covered over in something like a buttonhole stitch. They weren’t always the prettiest things either, but they were functional. Sometimes, a metal ring (like a jump ring used in jewelry) was bound underneath the stitches to make it even stronger. But plain old stitching can reinforce the holes pretty well.

When metal grommets were first introduced, they were used on corsets in the 19th century (in 1828, according to Norah Waugh in Corsets and Crinolines). Because metal could take a lot more stress, this helped corsetry create a distinctly hourglass figure in women. But corsets were strictly underwear (or cabaret garb) until Madonna Louise Ciccione made her “Like a Virgin” fashions trendy in the 1980s. Metal grommets were also commonly used in boots and shoes in the 19th century and early 20th century.

Metal eyelets down the back of a fantasy gown like my fairy-tale masquerade dress? Sure, OK!

Metal eyelets down the back of a fantasy gown like my fairy-tale masquerade dress? Sure, OK!

Even the language indicates the relative modernity of grommets. The Online Etymology Dictionary (which cites the Oxford English Dictionary, among other sources) explains that the word “grommet” dates to the 1620s with a meaning of “ring or wreath of rope” and the meaning of “metal eyelet” wasn’t recorded until 1769. “Eyelet” itself means simply a “small hole” and dates to the 14th century.

Thus, metal grommets showing on the outside of your pre-20th-century historical costumes are like having visible panty lines — at the very least, it’s a little tacky, and at the worst, it’s totally inaccurate.

Now, you may not care that metal grommets are historically inaccurate. Let the world see that your undies show! And sometimes you’re just in a hurry or you’re making an outfit that isn’t supposed to be super-accurate. OK, fine. I have stuff in my current costume closet with metal grommets showing for exactly those reasons too. But it helps to know the background and history before you disregard the rules.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

More Posts:

Posted in Articles | Tags: historical accuracy, historical research, rant | 10 Comments
« Elizabethan Wired Caps Preview
What the duck »

10 thoughts on “Why Metal Grommets Are the Visible Panty Lines of Historical Costuming”

  1. kendra says:
    February 17, 2012 at 4:59 pm

    HA! I love you!! So can we say “VMG” (visible metal grommets), as in VPL?

    • Trystan says:
      February 17, 2012 at 5:30 pm

      Totally – “omg, check out her VMG, do you think she knows?”

      • Sarah Lorraine says:
        February 17, 2012 at 5:51 pm

        Yes!

  2. Emily says:
    February 18, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    I’m making upholstery-cotton Elizabethan stays (the fabric was 50 cents for the lot, it’s practically bulletproof, and I’m broke :), and I think you’ve just pushed me over the line into the handmade eyelets camp.

    Which I’m pretty sure was your goal to begin with, right?

    • Trystan says:
      February 20, 2012 at 5:58 pm

      Awesome, go for it Emily! Handmade eyelets only cost the thread, which is cheaper than grommets anyway (& lasts longer usually). The Elizabethan stays I wear all the time & have had for about 5 years have handmade eyelets that still look & work great.

  3. Cilean Stirling says:
    February 18, 2012 at 8:37 pm

    Emily,

    Making your eyelets are way cost effective! It is all about the time!

    And ?? If you need help with this? You Tube to the rescue!
    Check this out!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTgLVMk05p0

    There are I think 4 to 5 parts but you really learn a lot!

    Cilean

    • Trystan says:
      February 20, 2012 at 6:00 pm

      Oooo, thanks Cilean! Great to have a video tutorial.

  4. tamara says:
    May 6, 2015 at 11:36 am

    Just as an aside, metal eyelets did exist in the Renaissance, just not as grommets. I’m going to have to dig through my books, but there’s a reference to eyelets being commissioned from a goldsmith. It’s in either “Dressing Renaissance Florence”, or ” The Cardinal’s Hat”.

    • Trystan L. Bass says:
      May 17, 2015 at 3:27 pm

      There are plenty of metal lacing rings used in the medieval period, but that’s different than grommets. Kimiko has some good examples here: http://kimiko1.com/research-16th/CostumeMythsWS/myth26.html It’s a very different effect than modern grommets.

  5. Wraith says:
    November 19, 2015 at 4:05 pm

    Great article.

    This is how The Doctor could have identified Robin Hood as a phoney in “Robot Of Sherwood”. His costume was covered in these. Of course (spoilers follow) Robin was supposed to be authentic and this was just the sort of VPL moment from the costume department that you describe.

    If only the doctor had Googled “when were eyelets invented” instead of faffing about with blood tests.

Comments are closed.

Search This Site

Posts by Topic

18th-c pale blue suit 1560s black & white Medici gown 1580s burgundy court gown accessory challenge Aouda bling books corsetry cosi fan tutte costume college cross-dressing Eugenie project fabric failure is always an option finished costume France group costumes handsewing is weird hats historical portrait historical research jewelry last-minute sewing Leonard macaroni made by Sarah makin' a muslin menswear pattern drafting pink & black robe a la francaise pretty in pink ruffs SCA arts & sciences SCA garb shopping sleevils to-do list travel trim trim trim twisted historical undies Valois gown Venetian carnevale Venetian courtesan wigs
Coconut bunnies & mango piggies at Peony Seafood Restaurant! Had dim sum with my parents & then we set up the cantilever umbrella on my patio, which was a huge hassle because of filling the giant base with sand. 18th-century but make it goth. I’m incapable of anything else! Another lazy Sunday for these two. I’ve finally got a purple(ish) rose! And lots of pink ones! The pink rose bush is in full sun, while the other is partly shaded. But the hated yellow rose flourished over there so I’m hopeful. Thanks to @the.garden.mamas for planting these beauties! All the other gothy plants seem to be going great too. The chair cushions I made a little while back are finally in place! A friend gave me one of those bat corkscrews! It’s not as quick to use as a regular one, but it sure is cute. Big crowd in SF today! Just a few of the signs I could get pix of. Heading into the weekend like… Done! Two chair cushions covered. Not the most perfect work, but functional. And fast — I patterned it from scratch & sewed 2 of them (with zippers) in a weekend!

Costume Closet on Facebook

Costume Closet on Facebook

Follow My Frock Flicks Posts

TBT: Camille (1984)
8 May 2025 - Sarah Lorraine

Camille (1984), starring a VERY young Colin Firth and Greta Sacchi, recently came up for [...]

WCW: Charity Wakefield
7 May 2025 - Trystan L. Bass

Working steadily in frock flicks for a couple decades now, Charity Wakefield has gone from [...]

Misbehaviour (2020)
6 May 2025 - Sarah Lorraine

Misbehaviour (2020) is about the 1970 Miss World competition in London, which was disrupted by [...]

MCM: Victor Garber
5 May 2025 - Kendra

I have residual warm fuzzy feelings for Canadian actor Victor Garber ever since his turn [...]

Frock Flicks Free-for-All May
2 May 2025 - The Frock Flicks Team

You asked for it, so here’s an occasional open thread to bitch about anything tangentially [...]

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Privacy Policy

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© Trystan L. Bass